New Jersey’s Comparative Negligence Laws for Car Accidents

All Practice Areas

Understanding Comparative Negligence

Comparative negligence allocates fault among multiple parties in a car accident. Unlike contributory negligence, which can bar recovery if a plaintiff is even slightly at fault, comparative negligence offers a balanced approach. It recognizes that multiple parties often share responsibility to varying degrees. This doctrine is especially important in motor vehicle accidents, where the actions of more than one driver typically contribute to the incident.

Understanding comparative negligence is essential for anyone involved in a collision. This knowledge can influence the outcome of a personal injury claim by affecting fault determination and damage calculations. For New Jersey residents, it is important to understand how state-specific rules govern comparative negligence and impact claims.

 

New Jersey’s Comparative Negligence Law

New Jersey follows a “modified comparative negligence” rule, known as the 51% rule. Injured parties can recover damages only if they are 50% or less at fault. If they are more than 50% at fault, they cannot recover any compensation. This rule allows plaintiffs to seek damages even if they share some responsibility, as long as their fault does not exceed the defendants’ share.

Percentage of Fault

The percentage of fault assigned to each party directly affects compensation. For example, if a plaintiff is 20% at fault, their total recovery reduces by that percentage.

Differences from Other States

New Jersey’s system differs from “pure comparative negligence” states, where plaintiffs can recover damages regardless of their fault, though their recovery decreases based on their degree of responsibility. Understanding these differences is essential for anyone involved in a motor vehicle accident in New Jersey.

Determining Fault in New Jersey Car Accidents

Determining fault in a car accident involves a thorough investigation and analysis of various factors. Law enforcement officers, insurance adjusters, and sometimes independent investigators play roles in this process. The key elements considered include traffic laws, accident reports, eyewitness testimonies, and physical evidence from the accident scene.

Police Reports

The process typically begins with the police report, which provides an initial assessment of fault based on the officers’ observations and statements from the involved parties. However, this report is not the final word on fault.

Insurance Investigations 

Insurance companies will conduct their own investigations, often involving detailed analysis of vehicle damage, skid marks, and sometimes accident reconstruction experts.

Eyewitness Statements

Eyewitness statements are critical, as they can provide an objective account of the events leading up to the accident. Additionally, modern technology, such as dashcams and surveillance footage, can offer valuable evidence to support or contest fault determinations.

Expert Testimony

Accident reconstruction experts analyze how an accident occurred, helping establish the sequence of events and assign fault accurately. Their detailed assessments ensure that fault determination is fair and precise.

Impact of Comparative Negligence on Compensation

New Jersey’s modified comparative negligence rule reduces a plaintiff’s compensation based on their share of fault.

Compensation Reduction
For example, if a plaintiff suffers $100,000 in damages but is 30% at fault, they recover $70,000. This adjustment reflects the plaintiff’s responsibility and prevents full compensation for accidents they contributed to.

No Compensation Over 50% Fault
If a plaintiff is more than 50% at fault, they cannot recover any compensation, regardless of injury severity or damages.

Understanding how fault percentages affect compensation is essential for plaintiffs in motor vehicle accident cases. Accurately establishing fault and effectively presenting your case can help minimize your assigned fault and maximize your recovery.

 

Legal Representation and Navigating Claims

Given the complexities of comparative negligence and the significant impact it can have on compensation, securing experienced legal representation is vital. An attorney with expertise in New Jersey’s motor vehicle accident laws can provide invaluable assistance throughout the claims process.

Expertise of The Epstein Law Firm

The Epstein Law Firm specializes in handling cases involving comparative negligence. Their team of skilled attorneys understands the nuances of New Jersey’s legal system and can effectively navigate the complexities of fault determination and compensation calculation. They work diligently to gather evidence, consult with experts, and build a strong case to minimise their client’s fault percentage and maximise their compensation.

Personalised Legal Strategies

The Epstein Law Firm develops legal strategies tailored to each case. They guide clients from the initial consultation through final resolution, ensuring clients stay informed and prepared at every stage of the process.

Contact The Epstein Law Firm Today

Understanding New Jersey’s comparative negligence laws is crucial for anyone involved in a motor vehicle accident in the state. The allocation of fault can significantly impact the outcome of a personal injury claim, affecting both the determination of liability and the calculation of damages. By securing experienced legal representation from firms like The Epstein Law Firm, plaintiffs can navigate these complexities more effectively, ensuring a fair and just resolution to their case.  Contact us today at 201-231-7847 or schedule a consultation online to learn more.