Truck Accident Lawyer
Uber Accident Lawyer
Lyft Accident Lawyer
Knowledge, experience, and dedication have brought the lawyers of The Epstein Law Firm to the forefront of their profession. From personal injury to civil litigation, they have built a strong record of success in achieving justice for their clients.
Our practice is diverse and well-established. Recognizing that every case is unique, we always begin by listening to you.
The Epstein Law Firm, P.A. has been successfully representing clients throughout New Jersey since 1973
A road construction accident can leave an important question unanswered: what did the work zone look like when you drove into it? Cones move, lanes reopen and equipment leaves. The condition that contributed to your crash may look different by the time an insurance adjuster visits.
The Epstein Law Firm helps people injured in New Jersey road construction accidents investigate both the driving and the work site. A collision involving a construction truck may require a different investigation from a crash caused by confusing lane markings or an unprotected excavation. Identifying that difference helps determine which records to preserve and whose conduct to examine.
Our broader car accident practice addresses motor vehicle injury claims. This page focuses on the additional questions that arise when road work changes the route, introduces equipment into traffic or creates a disputed roadway hazard.
The Epstein Law Firm
New Jersey Road Construction Accidents
Speak with The Epstein Law Firm about your situation and the next steps.
Call now
The location alone does not explain why a collision happened. A driver may have encountered a sudden queue, an unclear merge, an uneven surface or a truck entering from a closed lane. Each possibility calls for different evidence. A photograph taken after a crew changes the traffic pattern may show the project without showing the condition that mattered.
From a safe location, preserve photographs or existing footage that show the approach to the crash, not just the vehicles afterward. Keep original files and their dates. Do not enter a closed work area or stand in traffic to document a hazard. Useful information includes:
These details help connect a particular crew, traffic arrangement or vehicle movement to the collision. Tell your lawyer whether anything changed before police arrived or before photographs were taken. Distinguishing what you saw from what someone later told you makes the account more useful.
NJDOT’s Work Zone Safety Program explains the role of temporary traffic control in moving people safely through or around construction and maintenance work. On NJDOT jobs, its program requires a Traffic Control Coordinator. That provides a starting point for investigating project responsibilities; it does not establish that every road project belongs to NJDOT.
The investigation should compare the actual setup with the applicable project plans and requirements. Were drivers given a usable route through the work? Did markings lead toward a closed lane? Where could equipment enter? A contractor’s name on a truck does not, by itself, answer who selected, installed or maintained the traffic controls.
Driving still matters. A motorist can approach a merge too quickly, follow another vehicle too closely or move into a lane without checking. New Jersey’s ordinary-care instruction asks whether conduct met the care a reasonably prudent person would use in the circumstances. A work-zone condition and a driver’s conduct may both need examination; identifying one does not eliminate the other.
A work zone can involve a road owner, a general contractor, subcontractors and separate vehicle operators. Their responsibilities are not interchangeable. The key question is what each participant controlled and how that conduct relates to the injury, rather than simply naming every company associated with the project.
The Epstein Law Firm works with roadway-design engineers to investigate road construction accidents. Depending on the disputed issue, project records and technical review can help explain whether the problem involved road design, temporary traffic arrangements, site conditions or a vehicle maneuver. Relevant records may include:
A public-road claim requires particular care. New Jersey’s dangerous-public-property jury instruction imposes requirements beyond showing that a crash occurred on government property, including a substantial danger and the demanding “palpably unreasonable” standard. Government defenses and the evidence supporting the specific claim must be assessed before treating the road owner as responsible.
A public entity may be involved even when a private construction company is the most visible participant. The state’s tort-claim instructions generally require notice within 90 days of accrual; determining the correct recipient and any exception requires prompt attention. Reporting an accident to an insurer or making a road-maintenance complaint should not be treated as satisfying that notice requirement.
New Jersey’s general personal-injury filing period is two years after accrual, subject to exceptions and the rules governing the particular claim. That longer period does not replace a public-entity notice requirement.
Bring correspondence from every insurer or agency to the review. An acknowledgment that someone received paperwork is different from confirmation that the right claim was filed against the right party. Do not wait for every construction record to arrive before asking which steps must happen first.
For a covered automobile accident, personal injury protection, or PIP, addresses medical expenses without requiring an initial decision about fault. Which insurer pays first can depend on the policy, including whether health insurance was selected as primary. Give providers the coverage information they request and keep copies of bills, explanations of benefits and denial letters.
The liability claim addresses a different question: whether another party is legally responsible for losses. Treatment records, work restrictions and documentation of missed earnings help show what the crash changed. Pain-and-suffering claims can also involve the auto policy’s lawsuit limitation. Medical coverage and the ability to recover those damages are separate issues.
If you were working when injured, tell counsel and your employer. New Jersey’s workers’ compensation guidance explains the work-injury route and the employer or carrier’s role in selecting treatment. A potential claim against an outside party needs coordination with benefits already paid; the same loss is not simply collected twice.
Start with the investigating police agency and the incident number. The official crash-report service explains State Police report searches and the separate directions for toll roads. It does not provide every local police report. Save the downloaded report and compare the recorded location, vehicles and witnesses with your own information.
For a possible public-road claim, the Treasury notice instructions distinguish state highways from county and municipal roads and identify separate handling for toll-road authorities. Gather the exact location, date, photographs and injury information before beginning the relevant process. An agency report can help document the event, but an agency does not become your injury lawyer or decide every disputed issue of fault.
A rear impact does not always tell the whole story. In a reported Interstate 287 case, the firm obtained a $450,000 settlement after a motorist struck a truck that entered the roadway from a work area. The defense blamed the motorist; the firm’s account describes using multiple experts to establish the truck driver’s responsibility. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.
That experience illustrates why the sequence before impact deserves close attention. When you contact our team, describe the road layout, the movement you observed and your injuries. Bring the police-report information and insurance correspondence you have. You do not need to arrive with a completed engineering investigation to discuss how the firm can help examine the work zone and the available claim.
Tell our team which road you were traveling, how the work zone directed traffic and what happened before the collision. Bring available photographs, report information and insurance correspondence so we can discuss the conditions and your recovery.
Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Each case depends on its own facts, evidence, and applicable law.
These excerpts describe experiences with the firm. They are not identified as cases in this practice area and do not predict another outcome.
“Working directly with April, I found her to be professional, responsive & honest about the process. It was a difficult journey that was made easier by her expertise & support. I highly recommend April and this law firm for anyone seeking representation.”
— Amad · Read the full Google review
“Ms. Gilmore was very attentive with my case and walked me through it with ease. We had lots of laughter and even tears at times because I felt she put everything into achieving the best possible outcome for my benefit. I was able to relax and depend on her knowledge and expertise of the law.”
— Patricia · Read the full Google review
These answers provide general information. The roadway, parties, insurance coverage and available evidence can change the analysis of an individual accident.
Yes, a collision with another vehicle is not the only possible basis for a road construction injury claim. A hazardous condition or unsafe work activity may require investigation even when one vehicle leaves the road or strikes an obstruction. You still need evidence connecting another party’s legally actionable conduct to the injury; the fact that construction was nearby is not enough.
Preserve what shows the route you encountered, including existing footage, photographs and witness information. Identifying whether the condition was on public property matters because the rules governing a government defendant differ from an ordinary negligence claim. An investigation should examine both the condition and how the vehicle was being operated.
Sources: NJ Courts: Negligence and Ordinary Care; NJ Courts: Dangerous Condition of Public Property.
No. A company’s involvement in the project does not automatically establish responsibility for your collision. The inquiry concerns the work it controlled, the precautions required in the circumstances and the connection between its conduct and the injury. A vehicle operator, another contractor or a public entity may present different questions.
Project plans, crew records and the traffic arrangement can help separate those roles. NJDOT’s program identifies a Traffic Control Coordinator requirement for its jobs, but that does not establish who controlled a particular non-NJDOT project. Tell your lawyer which company names you observed without assuming that the most visible company necessarily caused the crash or was responsible for every safety measure.
Sources: NJDOT: Work Zone Safety Program; NJ Courts: Negligence and Ordinary Care.
A claim may be possible, but a public entity is not responsible merely because it owns the road. Dangerous-public-property claims have specific requirements and defenses. The official jury instruction includes a substantial risk of injury and asks whether the entity’s measures or failure to act were palpably unreasonable, a demanding standard that requires more analysis than simply identifying a bad condition.
The notice process must also be addressed separately. New Jersey’s Treasury directs county and municipal claims to those entities and provides different directions for toll roads. Give counsel the exact roadway and location so the appropriate entity and filing requirements can be investigated. Sending a complaint to an unrelated agency does not resolve these questions.
Sources: NJ Courts: Dangerous Condition of Public Property; NJ Treasury: Tort and Liability Notice.
Act promptly because a possible government claim can require notice long before the ordinary lawsuit deadline. State guidance generally calls for a tort notice within 90 days of accrual. New Jersey generally allows two years after accrual for a personal-injury lawsuit, but exceptions and claim-specific rules require review. The longer period should not be used to postpone the notice inquiry.
If time has already passed, have the dates and circumstances reviewed rather than assuming the claim is either preserved or lost. Late-notice relief involves court requirements and is not automatic. Keep the accident date, correspondence and proof of any submission together. Waiting for an insurer’s investigation is not a substitute for determining your filing obligations.
Sources: NJ Treasury: Tort and Liability Notice; N.J.S.A. 2A:14-2: Personal-Injury Actions.
A later change does not make earlier evidence useless, but it makes timing especially important. Photographs, original dashcam files and witnesses may help explain the arrangement you encountered. A picture of a later work phase should be identified as such rather than presented as proof of the setup at the moment of impact.
Ask counsel about preserving available project records and obtaining the police report. NJDOT’s work-zone program explains why temporary traffic arrangements deserve attention, while the official report service provides directions for obtaining covered crash reports. Neither a later photograph nor a report alone necessarily resolves the full sequence. Keep dates, file originals and your description of any observed changes together.
Sources: NJDOT: Work Zone Safety Program; New Jersey Crash Report Requests: Help.
For an eligible automobile accident, PIP can cover medical expenses regardless of who caused the crash, subject to the policy’s terms. If health insurance was selected as primary, the order of payment can differ. A dispute between the driver and the construction company does not, by itself, tell you which coverage should receive the medical bills.
Check your declarations and coverage selections, notify the appropriate insurer and keep payment explanations. Coverage limits, deductibles and treatment-related requirements may affect payment, so do not assume every bill will be paid in full. The injury claim against a responsible party is separate from this initial medical-payment process, and both need attention while treatment and the investigation continue.
Sources: NJDOBI: Selecting Your Health Insurer for PIP; NJDOBI: Standard Auto Insurance Policy.
Possibly. Under New Jersey’s comparative-negligence statute, a claimant’s negligence does not bar recovery when it is no greater than the combined negligence of the parties against whom recovery is sought. Recoverable damages are reduced by the claimant’s percentage of negligence. That requires an assessment of conduct and causation, not just the location of vehicle damage.
For example, an allegation that you approached a merge too quickly still needs to be evaluated alongside the relevant circumstances and other parties’ conduct. Preserve evidence of the signs, visibility and traffic arrangement, and discuss the allegation without treating an insurer’s initial position as the final result. Public-entity and coverage requirements can still impose separate limits.
Sources: N.J.S.A. 2A:15-5.1: Comparative Negligence; NJ Courts: Negligence and Ordinary Care.
A work-related injury may involve workers’ compensation as well as a potential claim against a responsible outside party. New Jersey’s worker guidance says to report the injury to the employer promptly and explains that the employer or carrier generally selects the treatment provider. This differs from assuming that an ordinary auto claim will handle every part of the loss.
Tell counsel who employed you, what task you were performing and which benefits have been paid. The state’s guidance also explains that a third-party recovery can create reimbursement or credit issues for workers’ compensation benefits. Those issues should be addressed together; receiving benefits does not make it appropriate to ignore another claim or collect the same loss twice.
Sources: NJ Department of Labor: Frequently Asked Questions for Workers; NJ Courts: Negligence and Ordinary Care.
Do not assume that a hazard report preserves a claim for compensation. A maintenance report, police report and formal tort notice serve different purposes. New Jersey’s Treasury instructions specify how a state tort notice must be submitted and direct claims involving other entities to the appropriate recipient. Reporting the condition can be useful without satisfying those legal requirements.
Save the report, confirmation and any response, then have the filing obligations checked separately. Even the state’s tort-notice process does not replace filing and serving court papers when a lawsuit is required. The general personal-injury limitation period also remains relevant. This distinction matters when an agency says it has logged a complaint but has not addressed an injury claim.
No. The limitation-on-lawsuit option concerns recovery for pain and suffering in covered circumstances; it is not the same as eliminating PIP medical benefits. New Jersey’s insurance guidance distinguishes those coverage choices. Whether the limitation applies to your particular claim and whether the injury meets the governing requirements need individual review.
Bring your policy declarations and medical records rather than deciding from the words “limited right to sue” alone. A collision involving another motorist and a claim concerning construction activity may raise different liability questions, so identifying the defendants and claim matters. Avoid assuming that a diagnosis automatically establishes eligibility or that choosing unlimited rights guarantees payment from anyone involved in the project.
Sources: NJDOBI: Standard Auto Insurance Policy; NJDOBI: Selecting Your Health Insurer for PIP.
No aspect of this advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court of New Jersey. Rating methodology
The Epstein Law Firm serves clients from three New Jersey locations:
Call for a free consultation.
$31,000,000
$13,585,000
*Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances. *No aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. View Rating Methodology
Δ
<span data-mce-type="bookmark" style="display: inline-block; width: 0px; overflow: hidden; line-height: 0;" class="mce_SELRES_start"></span>
340 West Passaic Street Rochelle Park, NJ 07662
Fax: 201-845-5973 201-231-7847
Map + Directions
560 Sylvan Avenue, Suite 1000-A Englewood Cliffs, NJ 07632 (By Appointment Only)
201-734-3763
Map + directions
18-20 Lackawanna Plaza, Suite 200 Montclair, NJ 07042 (By Appointment Only)
973-381-8410
The Epstein Law Firm
The Epstein Law Firm