When Ice Injuries Aren’t Negligence—And Why Accountability Still Matters

All Practice Areas

Expert Opinion | Personal Injury

By Michael J. Epstein

December 02, 2025

The law isn’t designed to punish people for living in cold climates. It’s designed to hold people accountable when they fail to act reasonably.

In my line of work, I meet people whose lives change in a single moment—a misstep, a patch of black ice, a fall that leads to surgery, months off work, and pain that lingers long after the snow melts.

I also hear something else, often from the public and sometimes even whispered by defense lawyers: “Well, it’s winter. These things happen.”

And that may be true, but not always.

Not every slip-and-fall on ice is someone’s fault. Winter is messy. Nature is unpredictable. And the law recognizes that property owners can’t shovel every snowflake in real time or prevent every natural patch of ice the moment it forms.

Understanding these exceptions is important, not to minimize injuries, but to keep the conversation grounded in reality. The law isn’t designed to punish people for living in cold climates. It’s designed to hold people accountable when they fail to act reasonably.

The Ongoing Storm Rule

In many states, courts apply what’s called the ongoing storm rule. The premise is simple: property owners generally do not have a duty to clear snow or ice while a storm is actively happening. Expecting someone to shovel during a blizzard isn’t reasonable—it’s physics-defying.

But here’s the part people miss: the rule has limits. Once the storm ends, the clock starts. Property owners must act within a reasonable time to clear accumulations, treat icy surfaces, and address dangerous conditions.

If it stopped snowing at 3 p.m. and someone falls on untreated ice at 9 a.m. the next day, citing a “storm” won’t work. Winter isn’t a blank check to ignore safety.

Natural Accumulation vs. Artificial Hazards

Another major concept in winter liability is the difference between natural accumulation and artificially created hazards.

Many states do not impose liability for natural snow or ice that forms due to ordinary winter conditions. But if human action created or worsened the danger, the rules change.

Examples of artificial or enhanced hazards include:

• A downspout draining directly onto a walkway, freezing nightly
• A sloped lot that funnels melting snow into pedestrian areas
• A plow piling snow in a place where runoff creates black ice
• A gutter leak turning front steps into a skating rink

In these situations, the property owner didn’t just fail to remove ice—they helped create it. And the law treats that differently.

Residential Homeowners—a Narrower Duty

Homeowners do not have the same obligations as commercial property owners or landlords. The law recognizes that no one expects a private driveway to be maintained like a supermarket parking lot.

That said, homeowners still owe a duty of reasonable care to guests. If a homeowner knows the front steps are a sheet of ice every morning due to a drainage issue and ignores it—or worse, invites someone over without warning them—that’s not winter being unpredictable. That’s conduct being unreasonable.

Most slip-and-fall claims against homeowners are covered by homeowners insurance, which exists to protect both the homeowner and the injured person. These are not morality plays or character judgments. They are risk-transfer mechanisms society created because accidents happen.

Comparative Negligence—Shared Responsibility

Even when someone else is partly at fault, personal responsibility still matters in the law. Most states apply some form of comparative negligence, meaning an injured person’s recovery can be reduced—or in some cases barred—if they contributed to the fall.

Think:

• Running on icy pavement
• Wearing improper footwear for conditions
• Ignoring obvious hazards
• Walking through a clearly cordoned-off area

Protecting your own safety doesn’t absolve negligent property owners—but it does recognize that responsibility isn’t one-sided.

Why These Limits Matter

If you’ve noticed a theme in these winter rules, it’s balance—a balance between reason and responsibility.

We don’t impose impossible duties. We don’t punish people for acts of nature. We don’t allow lawsuits for every winter stumble.

But we also don’t allow property owners to ignore obvious dangers.

The law is not designed to assign blame for weather. It’s designed to assign responsibility for human choices.

The Attorney’s Job: Accountability, Not Opportunism

Here’s a truth from inside the profession: the vast majority of legitimate winter-fall cases are not brought because someone slipped on a random patch of ice on a bad day. They are brought because:

• Complaints were ignored
• Ice formed repeatedly in the same dangerous location
• Drainage or maintenance failures were left unaddressed
• Property owners had ample time to act and didn’t

And just as importantly—good lawyers reject cases that fall outside these standards. We don’t serve clients or the justice system by pretending every winter injury is negligence.

A Civil Justice System Built on Realism

Winter is never going to be perfectly safe. No legal doctrine can change that. What the law can do—and does—is demand that property owners take reasonable, proactive steps to prevent preventable harm.

The ongoing storm rule exists for fairness. So does comparative negligence. So does the natural accumulation doctrine.

But fairness runs both ways. When a business leaves ice untouched long after a storm, when a landlord ignores a tenant’s warnings about refreezing steps, or when a homeowner knows a walkway ices over every night and does nothing—accountability isn’t punishment. It’s protection.

Winter Tests Us—The Law Measures How We Respond

We live in winter-heavy states because the community, culture, and life here are worth it. But winter demands responsibility. It asks everyone—property owners, landlords, homeowners, guests and pedestrians—to take reasonable care.

The law doesn’t expect perfection. It doesn’t demand superhuman response times. It simply requires fairness, diligence and common sense.

Snow falls. Ice forms. Winter happens. But how we prepare for it—and how we respond to it—is entirely within our control.

Michael J. Epstein is the managing partner of The Epstein Law Firm, P.A., and has represented hundreds of victims and families impacted by injuries because of negligence in New Jersey.

Originally published on Law.com/NJ Law Journal, December 2, 2025