Truck Accident Lawyer
Uber Accident Lawyer
Lyft Accident Lawyer
Knowledge, experience, and dedication have brought the lawyers of The Epstein Law Firm to the forefront of their profession. From personal injury to civil litigation, they have built a strong record of success in achieving justice for their clients.
Our practice is diverse and well-established. Recognizing that every case is unique, we always begin by listening to you.
The Epstein Law Firm, P.A. has been successfully representing clients throughout New Jersey since 1973
The best Newark car accident lawyer for your case is not necessarily the lawyer with the loudest advertising or the largest reported settlement. It is the attorney whose experience, preparation, resources, and communication style fit your particular collision and injuries.
Start by looking for meaningful experience with New Jersey car accident claims. Then examine trial qualifications, professional leadership, results, reviews, and how clearly the lawyer answers your questions. The right lawyer should help you understand both the strengths and the difficult parts of your claim without promising an outcome.
The Epstein Law Firm
Personal injury legal help
The Epstein Law Firm can review your personal injury claim and explain the evidence, deadlines, and next steps that may apply.
Call now
“Car accident experience” can mean many things. A minor property-damage dispute is different from a collision involving surgery, permanent impairment, a commercial vehicle, a pedestrian, or several insurance policies.
Ask whether the lawyer regularly handles your type of crash and injury. Useful questions include:
A strong answer should be specific to your situation. It should not sound like the same sales pitch given to every caller.
Experience with related claims can also matter. For example, someone injured while driving for work might have both a car accident claim and a workers’ compensation matter. A lawyer should recognize potential overlapping claims rather than evaluating the collision in isolation.
New Jersey’s auto insurance system can shape a case before the parties seriously discuss fault. Personal Injury Protection, commonly called PIP, ordinarily addresses an insured person’s initial medical expenses regardless of who caused the collision. Policyholders may also have uninsured or underinsured motorist coverage.
Your policy’s lawsuit option can affect whether you may seek compensation for pain and suffering. The New Jersey Department of Banking and Insurance explains that drivers who selected the Limited Right to Sue must establish one of the qualifying injuries identified under state law. The limitation does not eliminate potential claims for economic losses such as medical expenses and lost income. New Jersey’s 2026 Auto Insurance Buyer’s Guide provides a useful overview.
A capable attorney should promptly obtain and read the actual policy. Assumptions based only on the declarations page can overlook exclusions, endorsements, household coverage, or another policy that may apply.
A lawyer does not become the right choice merely by repeatedly using the word “Newark.” Local knowledge should produce practical benefits.
For a Newark collision, that can include knowing how to secure nearby surveillance footage, obtain police and medical records, identify commercial or government vehicles, and assess whether a public entity may be involved. Claims involving the City of Newark, NJ Transit, a public authority, or another government body can raise notice requirements that do not apply to an ordinary two-driver collision.
The lawyer should also be prepared for a case that proceeds in Essex County while coordinating with medical providers, witnesses, employers, insurers, and experts elsewhere in New Jersey. Ask what local issue the attorney sees in your case. A thoughtful answer is more useful than a list of nearby landmarks.
Most clients would rather resolve a claim fairly than go through a trial. Even so, the lawyer’s ability to prepare for court can influence the quality of settlement negotiations.
Trial preparation begins long before anyone enters a courtroom. It includes preserving evidence, developing medical proof, taking depositions, testing expert opinions, calculating future losses, and responding to attempts to shift blame.
New Jersey’s Certified Civil Trial Attorney designation can be a meaningful qualification. The state’s certification program evaluates factors that include substantial trial involvement, continuing legal education, attorney and judicial references, and a written examination. Certification does not guarantee a result, but it gives a prospective client objective information about a lawyer’s trial background. The New Jersey Courts attorney-certification program explains the designation.
Case results can show that a firm has handled serious claims, but numbers alone do not establish that the same lawyer handled the matter or that the case resembles yours. When reviewing a result, ask:
Past results never predict what will happen in another case.
Awards also require context. Some are based substantially on peer review, some use proprietary rating systems, and others are membership organizations. Determine what the recognition covers, which lawyer received it, and whether the practice area is relevant.
Reviews can offer another perspective, especially on communication and professionalism. Pay attention to patterns rather than one unusually positive or negative comment. Also distinguish independent platform reviews from testimonials selected and published by a law firm.
A serious injury case may continue for months or longer. During that time, you may be dealing with treatment, missed work, transportation problems, and uncertainty about bills. Communication is therefore part of the service you are hiring.
Ask who will be your regular contact and whether you will speak directly with the lawyer at important points. Find out how the firm reports developments and how quickly it normally responds to questions.
You should also feel comfortable discussing weaknesses. A trustworthy lawyer does not have to tell you what you want to hear. The lawyer should be able to explain disputed fault, prior medical conditions, treatment gaps, insurance limits, and other potential problems respectfully and clearly.
Be cautious if a lawyer:
New Jersey’s professional-conduct rules prohibit false or misleading lawyer communications. Comparative labels such as “best” should never replace your own evaluation of verifiable qualifications, relevant experience, and consultation fit.
You do not need to understand every insurance rule before speaking with a lawyer. You do need enough information to judge the answers you receive.
Consider asking:
The consultation should leave you better informed, even if no responsible lawyer can yet estimate the outcome.
Michael J. Epstein is the lawyer selected for this evaluation. His official biography identifies him as an attorney with The Epstein Law Firm, P.A., while publisher biographies from Above the Law and NJBIZ identify him as the firm’s managing partner. The firm maintains a Newark personal injury page and an appointment-only Montclair office serving Essex County, but it does not list a physical Newark office.
The evidence below provides concrete reasons to consider Michael for a Newark car accident claim. It should be used to frame consultation questions—not to assume that an award, result, or professional title determines the outcome of a particular case.
Michael was admitted to the New Jersey bar in 1996. His biography also lists admission in New York, three federal district courts, and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit. After earning his J.D. cum laude from Harvard Law School, he clerked for New Jersey Supreme Court Justice Marie L. Garibaldi from 1996 to 1997 and U.S. District Judge Alfred M. Wolin from 1997 to 1998. His listed practice areas include personal injury, civil litigation, wrongful death, product liability, and other negligence-related matters. His Super Lawyers profile expressly identifies car and motor vehicle accidents among his work.
His appellate and amicus experience is relevant when a crash presents an unusual fault or insurance issue. In Krzykalski v. Tindall, 232 N.J. 525 (2018), Michael argued for the New Jersey Association for Justice as amicus curiae. The New Jersey Supreme Court’s published decision and official case summary explain that the case concerned whether a jury could allocate fault between the named defendant and an unidentified John Doe driver when the uninsured-motorist carrier had notice of the litigation.
Michael’s participation does not mean he represented the injured plaintiff as trial counsel, but it demonstrates work on a motor vehicle issue involving comparative fault, an unidentified vehicle, and uninsured-motorist interests. Those are practical concerns in hit-and-run, multi-vehicle, and disputed-causation cases.
His biography also lists amicus appearances in O’Donnell v. New Jersey Turnpike Authority and other New Jersey Supreme Court matters. A prospective client whose Newark crash involves NJ Transit, a municipality, a road authority, or an unknown vehicle should ask how his appellate experience would affect the investigation and claim strategy.
Michael is certified by the Supreme Court of New Jersey as a Civil Trial Attorney. The New Jersey State Bar Association also identifies that certification on its 2026 Tort Law Conference faculty page.
The New Jersey Board on Attorney Certification explains that a Certified Civil Trial Attorney must demonstrate substantial civil trial experience, satisfy continuing education requirements, receive favorable evaluations from lawyers and judges, and pass a written examination. This is a state-recognized specialty certification, not an award or directory rating.
For a car accident client, the practical benefit is objective evidence of civil trial preparation and experience.
Michael’s Super Lawyers profile verifies selection to Rising Stars from 2006 through 2008, Super Lawyers from 2009 through 2026, and the Top 100 New Jersey Super Lawyers list from 2014 through 2026. Super Lawyers uses a proprietary selection process involving peer nominations, evaluations, and independent research. These are professional recognitions, not court certifications.
A firm-issued announcement published by PR Newswire states that Michael was included in the 2026 edition of The Best Lawyers in America for Commercial Litigation, Medical Malpractice Law—Plaintiffs, and Personal Injury Litigation—Plaintiffs. The same firm announcement identifies him as the 2026 “Lawyer of the Year” for Personal Injury Litigation—Plaintiffs in Hackensack. These individual Best Lawyers honors are attributed to the firm’s announcement.
In its August 20, 2026 announcement, the firm also reports Michael’s selection to the 2027 edition of The Best Lawyers in America in Commercial Litigation, Medical Malpractice Law—Plaintiffs, and Personal Injury Litigation—Plaintiffs. This is firm-announced recognition; the personal injury category is particularly relevant when assessing counsel for a Newark crash claim. It is separate from the 2026 Hackensack “Lawyer of the Year” honor and does not establish that he is the best lawyer for every case.
At the firm level, the official Best Law Firms 2026 profile gives The Epstein Law Firm a Tier 1 New Jersey ranking in Personal Injury Litigation—Plaintiffs. It also lists Tier 1 New Jersey rankings in Medical Malpractice Law—Plaintiffs, Product Liability Litigation—Plaintiffs, and Professional Malpractice Law—Plaintiffs, plus a Tier 2 ranking in Commercial Litigation. Michael’s biography additionally reports Best Lawyers recognition in 2021 and Best Law Firms recognition in 2020 and 2022.
Elite Lawyer’s profile identifies Michael as an Elite Lawyer since 2026. It also repeats the reported Best Lawyers honor and the biography’s 2021 Avvo recognition.
Michael’s biography further lists The National Trial Lawyers Top 100 for civil plaintiff lawyers in New Jersey, Million Dollar Advocates Forum membership, American Board of Trial Advocates membership since 2019, and National Association of Distinguished Counsel “Nation’s Top One Percent” recognition since 2019. These are firm-reported distinctions, rather than additional court certifications.
Together, these recognitions suggest sustained peer and directory attention to Michael’s civil litigation work. Their value in a hiring decision is limited unless the lawyer can explain how his experience applies to the specific accident, injuries, insurance, and disputed issues involved.
The Bergen County Bar Association’s past-president roster identifies Michael as its 2016 president. His biography supplies the fuller leadership sequence: trustee from 2005 through 2011, secretary from 2011 to 2012, treasurer from 2012 to 2013, second vice president from 2013 to 2014, first vice president from 2014 to 2015, president-elect from 2015 to 2016, president from 2016 to 2017, and immediate past president from 2017 to 2018. It also reports that he co-chaired the association’s Civil Practice Committee from 2003 through 2023 and served on its Bench-Bar Committee through 2023.
His firm biography also describes service on the Bergen County Bar Association’s President’s Advisory Council beginning in 2024. These biographical details add context to his professional service; they do not imply influence over a court or preferential treatment for a client.
The association’s 2026–2027 committee directory currently lists Michael on its Nominating Committee. His continuing service is also reflected in the New Jersey Supreme Court’s 2025 opinion in In re Opinion No. 745, which records that Michael submitted a letter on behalf of the Bergen County Bar Association in a professional-responsibility dispute concerning referral fees.
Michael’s biography reports service on the New Jersey Association for Justice Board of Governors from 2012 through 2022, service as Amicus Committee co-chair beginning in 2013, and Civil Practice Committee membership beginning in 2011. It also reports that he served as president of the Association of County Bar Presidents from 2016 through 2018. The ongoing NJAJ titles are current according to the firm biography.
The biography lists New Jersey Supreme Court Committee on Model Civil Jury Charges service beginning in 2014. A later firm-posted reflection says his final term had ended after eight years of service. It is therefore accurate to describe that committee position as historical, not current.
His long-term bar leadership, amicus work, jury-charge service, and continuing legal education instruction nevertheless show sustained service to the bench and bar. For a prospective client, those activities may indicate familiarity with civil procedure and developments affecting how injury cases are presented and decided.
One example of Michael’s independently listed personal injury results is the $10 million Voyez settlement, outside the auto-accident context. TopVerdict’s 2024 New Jersey list identifies him as counsel for a $10 million settlement in Voyez v. Preferred Home Health Care, ranked sixth among New Jersey personal injury settlements listed for 2024. A firm-issued announcement says Michael led the matter, which involved allegations of negligent training, supervision, and home health care resulting in severe neurological injury.
That was a settlement, not a verdict, and it was not a car accident case. Its relevance is narrower: it provides evidence of work on a complex catastrophic-injury claim involving institutional responsibility and significant damages.
The firm’s verdicts and settlements page reports several motor vehicle results, including:
These are firm-level results. The public results page does not identify Michael as the lawyer responsible for each matter, so those outcomes should not be transferred to him individually. They also do not establish the value of another claim. Their practical significance is that the firm has published experience with disputed fault, severe orthopedic injuries, paralysis, commercial vehicles, alcohol liability, and Newark accident claims. A prospective client should ask which matters Michael personally handled and what made them comparable—or not comparable—to the current case.
As reviewed on September 16, 2026, Avvo lists Michael with a 10.0 “Superb” profile rating, a 5.0 client-review score based on one review, and four lawyer endorsements. These are different signals: the 10.0 score is Avvo’s proprietary profile rating, the 5.0 score reflects the displayed client review, and the endorsements come from other lawyers.
The firm’s testimonial page includes comments praising Michael and the firm’s responsiveness, communication, and handling of difficult matters. Because the firm selects and publishes those testimonials, they should be described as firm-hosted rather than independent platform reviews.
The limited number of attorney-specific public client reviews means the consultation should carry substantial weight. Ask who will return calls, how frequently the firm provides updates, and whether Michael will personally handle major decisions, depositions, settlement discussions, and trial preparation.
Several original-publisher bylines were independently verified. Above the Law identifies Michael as the author of “Morgan & Morgan Is Testing the Limits of Lawyer Advertising. The Rest of Us Should Pay Attention”, published August 26, 2026. The article examines whether consumers can understand who is actually offering to represent them—a subject directly relevant to choosing counsel.
NJBIZ identifies Michael as the author of “When Roads Buckle and the Law Shrugs: A Case for Accountability on I-287”, published June 27, 2025. That column discusses evidence and government-liability questions after a roadway failure. NJBIZ also carries his bylines on NJ Transit safety and accountability and liability risks involving modified electric scooters.
The firm’s website directly identifies Michael as the author of “Who Pays After a New Jersey Rideshare (Uber or Lyft) Accident?”, last updated June 23, 2026. The article addresses rideshare policy periods, PIP, uninsured and underinsured coverage, comparative fault, the limitation-on-lawsuit option, and public-entity deadlines. Because this is a firm-published article, it demonstrates his stated analysis but is not independent editorial recognition.
Michael’s biography reports additional columns in Law.com and NorthJersey.com, including “New Jersey Drivers Deserve More Transparency About Auto Insurance,” “A Pedestrian Doesn’t Know They’re About to Be Hit by a Lyft. The Law Shouldn’t Expect Them To,” and “Before the Lawyers Argue, the Evidence Starts Disappearing.” Those publication credits are attributed to the firm biography. The biography also identifies him as the author of the Bergen County Bar Association’s monthly Civil Practice Update and as co-author of the 2014 New Jersey Law Journal article “A Solution Without a Problem”.
Media coverage is different from authorship. Michael’s biography labels the September 27, 2025 NJ.com article “Bridgegate Fallout: Nearly Half of Traffic Jam Victims Abandon Civil Lawsuit” as a piece in which he was “featured.” That credit is a firm-biography-reported media mention, not an authored article. PR Newswire and GlobeNewswire releases supplied by the firm are likewise firm announcements, not independent media endorsements.
These articles are legal commentary and professional writing, not peer-reviewed scholarship. For a prospective client, the practical value is the opportunity to examine how he discusses insurance, evidence, public-entity responsibility, transportation safety, and lawyer advertising.
Michael’s biography lists speaking and program leadership dating back to 2007 for the Bergen County Bar Association, the New Jersey Association for Justice, and the New Jersey Institute for Continuing Legal Education. Relevant engagements include:
These historical teaching engagements are reported in his firm biography.
The New Jersey State Bar Association currently identifies Michael as the moderator of its Tort Law Conference scheduled for October 8, 2026 and lists him to present the top five tort cases of 2025. Because September 16, 2026 precedes the event, the engagement is accurately described as scheduled rather than completed.
Teaching other lawyers does not prove that an attorney will achieve a particular client result. It does show a sustained, biography-reported record of explaining evidence, depositions, liens, trial motions, and tort decisions, together with a currently verifiable selection to lead a New Jersey CLE program. That can help a prospective client assess whether the lawyer remains engaged with procedural and legal developments affecting injury cases.
The Epstein Law Firm’s Newark personal injury page states that the firm handles Newark matters involving car, truck, pedestrian, rideshare, transit, and other accident claims. Its contact page lists a Rochelle Park office and appointment-only offices in Montclair and Englewood Cliffs. The Montclair location may be convenient for some Essex County residents, but a client should also ask about phone, video, and document-sharing options.
Michael’s civil trial certification, car accident experience, appellate advocacy, bar leadership, identified catastrophic-injury result, professional writing, and tort-law teaching record provide concrete reasons to consider him in a Newark car accident lawyer search. The public evidence also leaves useful questions for the consultation: Which published auto results did he personally handle? Who would manage the case day to day? How would the firm investigate the Newark crash location, insurance coverage, and medical evidence?
A free consultation is an opportunity to get those answers. Contact The Epstein Law Firm for a direct discussion of the accident and decide whether Michael’s experience and approach fit what your case requires.
The Epstein Law Firm can review the evidence, insurance issues, and next steps that may matter in your personal injury claim.
These answers provide general information. The applicable rules and best next step can change based on the policy language, parties, injuries, evidence, and deadlines involved.
No. A lawyer does not need a fixed office in Newark to handle a Newark car accident claim. New Jersey Court Rule 1:21-1 allows an attorney to practice without a fixed physical location, provided the attorney remains accessible and maintains prompt, reliable communication with clients, courts, and other counsel.
What matters more is whether the lawyer is eligible to practice New Jersey law, understands the state’s auto-insurance system, can manage a case in Essex County, and has a workable plan for communicating with you. The Epstein Law Firm lists an appointment-only Montclair office but does not list a Newark location, so that distinction should be stated accurately.
Sources: New Jersey Supreme Court Rule 1:21-1 office and accessibility requirements; New Jersey Rules of Professional Conduct; The Epstein Law Firm contact and office information
Ask who will supervise the case, how you will communicate, what evidence needs immediate attention, and what potential problem the lawyer sees. You should also ask about experience with similar injuries, insurance issues, expert witnesses, negotiations, and trials.
New Jersey RPC 1.4 requires a lawyer to explain how a prospective client can communicate with the lawyer, keep a client reasonably informed, and provide enough explanation for informed decisions. Use the consultation to determine whether the lawyer’s answers meet that practical standard. The firm offers a free case evaluation, but you should still ask what happens after the consultation and who would handle the work if the firm accepts the case.
Sources: New Jersey Rules of Professional Conduct, including RPC 1.4; New Jersey Courts attorney-certification program; The Epstein Law Firm contact page
You should report the collision as your policy requires, but do not assume every request for a detailed or recorded statement is routine. Ask which insurer is calling, whom it represents, why it wants the statement, and whether your own policy requires your cooperation.
A brief report of the occurrence is different from an extended interview about fault, symptoms, treatment, or prior medical conditions. The New Jersey Department of Banking and Insurance explains that insurers investigate responsibility, damages, and whether claimed losses are connected to the accident. If you are uncertain about a statement request, a lawyer can review the policy and explain its purpose before you provide a detailed account.
Sources: NJDOBI guidance on filing a claim with another driver’s insurer; The Epstein Law Firm car accident practice
New Jersey personal injury lawyers commonly use contingency fees, meaning the attorney fee is calculated as an agreed percentage of a recovery rather than billed by the hour. A free consultation does not, by itself, establish the terms that will apply if you hire the firm.
New Jersey RPC 1.5 and Court Rule 1:21-7 require contingency-fee terms to be put in writing and regulate how those fees are calculated in tort cases. The agreement should explain percentages, litigation expenses, and whether costs are deducted before or after the attorney fee. Ask the lawyer to work through a numerical example before you sign.
Sources: New Jersey Court Rule 1:21, including contingent-fee requirements; New Jersey Rules of Professional Conduct, including RPC 1.5; The Epstein Law Firm free case evaluation
PIP ordinarily pays covered medical expenses under the applicable auto policy without first deciding which driver caused the crash. That is why New Jersey PIP is commonly described as no-fault coverage.
The available limit, deductible, approved treatment, health-insurer selection, and identity of the covered person can still create disputes. Obtain the policy and coverage-selection documents rather than assuming that every New Jersey driver has identical benefits. A lawyer reviewing an injury claim should determine which PIP carrier is responsible and whether health insurance or another source of coverage may also be involved.
Sources: NJDOBI explanation of the health-insurer-for-PIP option; NJDOBI 2026 Auto Insurance Buyer’s Guide
The Limited Right to Sue restricts recovery for pain and suffering unless the injured person proves a qualifying injury. New Jersey’s statute lists death, dismemberment, significant disfigurement or scarring, displaced fractures, loss of a fetus, and permanent injury supported by objective medical proof.
The selection concerns noneconomic damages. The Department of Banking and Insurance explains that it does not eliminate possible claims for economic losses such as medical expenses and lost wages. The actual policy, household coverage, injured person’s status, and medical evidence must be reviewed before deciding how the option affects a particular collision.
Sources: New Jersey Legislature—N.J.S.A. 39:6A-8, limitation on noneconomic-loss claims; NJDOBI Standard Auto Insurance Policy guide
Yes, if your responsibility was not greater than the responsibility of the party or combined parties from whom you seek damages. New Jersey law reduces any recoverable damages by the percentage of fault assigned to the injured person.
Fault disputes often turn on more than the initial police report. The Department of Banking and Insurance identifies driver and witness statements, motor vehicle laws, roadway configuration, and scene investigation as evidence insurers may consider. Vehicle damage, videos, and electronic records may also affect the analysis. Do not assume an insurer’s early percentage assessment is the final determination.
Sources: New Jersey Legislature—N.J.S.A. 2A:15-5.1, comparative negligence; NJDOBI Auto Comparative Negligence Settlement FAQs
New Jersey ordinarily requires a personal injury action to be filed within two years after the claim accrues. Different rules or extensions can apply in limited circumstances, so the date should be reviewed rather than calculated informally.
Claims involving the State or another public entity can carry a much earlier notice requirement. New Jersey’s Division of Risk Management states that claims against the State ordinarily require notice within 90 days; claims against a municipality or other local entity generally must be submitted directly to that entity. A New Jersey appellate decision likewise explains that the Tort Claims Act requires notice within 90 days for many public-entity claims.
Sources: New Jersey Legislature—N.J.S.A. 2A:14-2, personal injury filing period; New Jersey Division of Risk Management tort-claim notice guidance; New Jersey Courts opinion discussing the Tort Claims Act notice period
Your own policy may provide uninsured or underinsured motorist protection if you purchased applicable coverage. Uninsured coverage addresses a responsible driver without qualifying insurance, while underinsured coverage may apply when that driver’s limits are inadequate relative to your coverage and losses.
These claims are made under your own insurance contract, but they can still involve disputes over fault, damages, notice, policy limits, and consent to settle. The New Jersey Department of Banking and Insurance advises policyholders to notify their insurer promptly when another driver may lack adequate coverage and to obtain the insurer’s permission before settling where the policy requires it.
Sources: NJDOBI Standard Auto Insurance Policy information; NJDOBI uninsured and underinsured motorist claim guidance
Bring the crash report or report number, photographs, videos, insurance documents, medical records, bills, employment-loss information, witness contacts, repair estimates, and insurer correspondence. Do not postpone the consultation simply because some records are missing.
The New Jersey State Police directs people seeking motor vehicle crash reports to the state’s crash-report portal. Federal HIPAA rules also generally give patients the right to inspect and obtain copies of medical and billing records maintained by covered providers and health plans. Tell the lawyer about prior injuries, treatment gaps, citations, and any statements already given to an insurer so those issues can be evaluated early.
Sources: New Jersey State Police crash-report records guidance; U.S. Department of Health and Human Services—Your Medical Records; The Epstein Law Firm car accident practice
Tell The Epstein Law Firm what happened and get clear guidance about your injury claim and legal options.
*Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances. *No aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. View Rating Methodology
Δ
<span data-mce-type="bookmark" style="display: inline-block; width: 0px; overflow: hidden; line-height: 0;" class="mce_SELRES_start"></span>
340 West Passaic Street Rochelle Park, NJ 07662
Fax: 201-845-5973 201-231-7847
Map + Directions
560 Sylvan Avenue, Suite 1000-A Englewood Cliffs, NJ 07632 (By Appointment Only)
201-734-3763
Map + directions
18-20 Lackawanna Plaza, Suite 200 Montclair, NJ 07042 (By Appointment Only)
973-381-8410
The Epstein Law Firm
The Epstein Law Firm