Truck Accident Lawyer
Uber Accident Lawyer
Lyft Accident Lawyer
Knowledge, experience, and dedication have brought the lawyers of The Epstein Law Firm to the forefront of their profession. From personal injury to civil litigation, they have built a strong record of success in achieving justice for their clients.
Our practice is diverse and well-established. Recognizing that every case is unique, we always begin by listening to you.
The Epstein Law Firm, P.A. has been successfully representing clients throughout New Jersey since 1973
Cancer outcomes are decided by timing. The same tumor that is curable when found early becomes a fight for survival when found late, which is why a physician’s failure to diagnose cancer — the screening never offered, the symptom explained away, the abnormal result never followed — is among the most consequential errors in medicine. The failure is rarely dramatic. It is a colonoscopy postponed past the guideline age, a breast lump attributed to a cyst without imaging, a smoker’s cough treated through three rounds of antibiotics while no one orders the chest scan.
The Epstein Law Firm represents New Jersey patients and families harmed by failures to diagnose cancer, from our Rochelle Park office. This page explains how cancers are missed, the difference between a failure to diagnose and a delayed diagnosis, and how New Jersey law treats these claims, as part of our New Jersey medical malpractice practice. If your cancer was found later than it should have been, call (201) 231-7847 for a free review.
The most common failure is anchoring: the physician settles on a harmless explanation — reflux, hemorrhoids, a pulled muscle, menopause, stress — and never revisits it as the symptoms persist or evolve. Rectal bleeding is treated as hemorrhoids without a colonoscopy. A persistent cough is treated as bronchitis without imaging. Back pain is treated as strain while a tumor grows. Standards of care exist precisely to break anchoring: red-flag presentations carry defined workups, and a physician who watches a red flag through visit after visit without performing them has departed from those standards.
For patients without symptoms, screening is the safety net, and it fails when physicians do not offer guideline-indicated tests or do not track whether ordered tests were completed. Mammography, cervical screening, colorectal screening, low-dose CT for patients with significant smoking histories, and prostate screening conversations all carry age- and risk-based recommendations from the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force and specialty societies. A practice with no system for identifying who is due — or for following up the patient who never scheduled — manufactures these cases.
Sometimes the test was done and the answer existed: the mammogram flagged as suspicious, the lab value trending the wrong way, the pathology report recommending excision. The failure is in the follow-through — results filed without review, letters never sent, referrals never made, and no tickler system to catch the patient who fell through. Our radiology errors page addresses misread imaging; this failure mode is its administrative twin, and the electronic audit trail usually proves it completely.
When tissue is finally sampled, the diagnosis depends on the pathologist. Slides misread as benign, specimens contaminated or switched, margins misreported, and findings communicated ambiguously all produce false reassurance with a laboratory’s authority behind it. Because the slides and tissue blocks are retained, these are among the most provable of all diagnostic failures: the evidence can simply be read again by a qualified expert.
Primary physicians are not expected to diagnose every cancer themselves; they are expected to recognize presentations that exceed their lane and refer — to gastroenterology, pulmonology, dermatology, urology, or surgery — in time for the referral to matter. A referral delayed by months of repeated reassurance, or never documented at all, is a failure of the referring physician even when the specialist would have made the diagnosis in one visit.
The Epstein Law Firm
Medical malpractice legal help
The Epstein Law Firm can review your medical malpractice claim and explain the evidence, deadlines, and next steps that may apply.
Call now
(201) 231-7847Schedule your free case evaluation
The two claims are cousins, and many cases contain both. A delayed diagnosis case, the subject of our delayed cancer diagnosis page, involves a condition that was suspected or partially worked up but not confirmed and treated in time. A failure to diagnose case, the subject of this page, begins earlier: the test was never ordered, the screening never offered, the referral never made, so the diagnostic process never started. The distinction matters for identifying defendants (the failure usually sits with the front-line physician and the practice’s systems) and for the counterfactual the experts must prove: what the standard test, done when it should have been, would most likely have shown. Our general cancer misdiagnosis page addresses the broader subject for patients unsure which pattern fits their experience.
Certain cancers dominate these claims because their early presentations mimic benign conditions: colorectal cancer (bleeding blamed on hemorrhoids), lung cancer (cough blamed on bronchitis or reflux), breast cancer (lumps blamed on cysts), prostate cancer (urinary symptoms blamed on aging), pancreatic cancer (pain and weight loss blamed on gallbladder or stress), ovarian cancer (bloating blamed on digestion), and melanoma (lesions never biopsied). For each, the damages question is the same and it is measured in staging. Stage I disease is commonly treated with local therapy and carries high cure rates; Stage III and IV disease requires systemic treatment and carries the prognosis the patient now faces. New Jersey’s increased-risk doctrine, associated with Scafidi v. Seiler, permits recovery for that worsening: the plaintiff need not prove the cancer would certainly have been cured, only that the delay materially increased the risk and worsened the outcome. Oncologists prove it from the tumor’s pathology, its known growth behavior, and the stage at which the standard workup would have caught it.
The causes are systemic as much as individual: fifteen-minute appointments that reward reassurance over investigation, volume-driven practices with no registry tracking who is due for screening, electronic result inboxes with no accountable owner, and the cognitive pull of the common explanation over the dangerous one. None of these is a defense. The standard of care is defined by what the presentation required, not by how busy the office was, and the practice’s systems — or their absence — are themselves part of the case, often making the institution a defendant alongside the physician.
Two patient groups recur in these cases and deserve mention. The first is younger patients, whose symptoms are reflexively attributed to benign causes of youth — the rectal bleeding of a 38-year-old, the persistent pain of a 30-year-old — while guideline thinking lags behind the rising incidence of early-onset cancers; age is a risk factor, not a rule-out, and a presentation that would trigger a workup at 60 does not become safe at 38 because it is less common. The second is patients whose care is fragmented among urgent-care centers, emergency departments, and rotating providers, where no single physician owns the timeline and each visit is treated as the first. Fragmentation explains a missed diagnosis; it does not excuse it, because the duty to review the record the patient brings, and to safety-net the follow-up, belongs to whoever undertakes the care.
These claims require expert proof on two fronts: a physician in the defendant’s specialty establishing that the workup, screening, referral, or follow-up departed from accepted standards, and an oncologist establishing what timely diagnosis would have changed. New Jersey’s affidavit of merit statute, N.J.S.A. 2A:53A-27, requires the expert affidavit within 60 days after the answer, so both opinions are developed before suit. The limitations period is generally two years under N.J.S.A. 2A:14-2, and the discovery rule is pivotal: time typically runs from when the patient knew or should have known of the cancer and that it could have been found earlier, not from the missed appointment itself. Compensatory damages are uncapped in New Jersey malpractice cases; charitable-immunity limits can affect claims against nonprofit hospitals, and wrongful-death and survival claims are available to families when the delay proves fatal.
The Epstein Law Firm can review the evidence, insurance issues, and next steps that may matter in your medical malpractice claim.
Focus first on treatment: your oncology care now is what matters most, and litigation proceeds around it. Preserve the pre-diagnosis record: request records from every physician, practice, imaging center, and laboratory involved before the diagnosis — including visit notes, orders, results, and referral documentation —> because#8212; because the case lives in what was (and was not) done at each step. Build your timeline of symptoms reported, appointments, tests, and what you were told; contemporaneous notes, portal messages, and calendar entries are valuable. Do not confront or accuse the original physician as a strategy; the records speak better than the argument. And start the expert review early: two coordinated expert opinions take time, and the limitations clock does not wait for them.
If you are still in the diagnostic process rather than past it — symptoms persisting, answers vague, a workup that keeps slipping — the advice is simpler and more urgent: ask directly what diagnoses are being ruled out, what test would rule them out, and when it will happen, and get the answers in the patient portal where they are recorded. Patients who press those questions change their own timelines, and the record of having pressed them matters if the answers never came.
We assemble the complete pre-diagnosis chart across every provider, then construct the counterfactual with experts: the specialty physician identifies each point at which the standard required action, and the oncologist establishes the stage and treatment the patient would most likely have faced at that point, against the stage and treatment reality delivered. Pathology slides are re-read where sampling occurred. Where systems failed — lost results, unowned inboxes, missing registries — we pursue the institution’s own policies and audit trails. The case is filed in the Superior Court of the appropriate county and prepared for trial, because defendants in diagnostic-delay cases settle when the timeline and the staging evidence leave them nothing better to say.
A practical note on evidence: the guideline chronology often becomes the case’s central exhibit. For each visit, we chart the documented presentation, the guideline-indicated response, and what actually occurred, so that the departure is visible at a glance rather than buried in expert prose. Defendants answer that exhibit with hindsight arguments — the cancer was rare, the presentation atypical — and the chart is built to meet those arguments from the contemporaneous record, which is the ground on which these cases are properly decided.
The Epstein Law Firm has represented New Jersey medical malpractice clients for decades from our Rochelle Park office. Michael J. Epstein was selected to the New Jersey Super Lawyers Top 100 list for 2026 and holds an AV Preeminent rating from Martindale-Hubbell, and TopVerdict has ranked the firm’s results at the top of New Jersey lists, including the Number 1 Medical Malpractice Settlement in the state in 2024 and a Top 10 New Jersey Personal Injury Settlement that year. Read the PR Newswire release on the firm’s Top 20 U.S. medical malpractice settlement recognition, and see the firm’s post on Michael Epstein’s 2026 Personal Injury Lawyer of the Year recognition. Our attorneys have pursued cancer-diagnosis claims in which the decisive work was reconstructing years of primary-care visits into the timeline the jury ultimately followed.
Our attorneys have recovered substantial verdicts and settlements for clients across New Jersey, including:
Every case is different, and past results do not guarantee a similar outcome. What they do show is the level of preparation and persistence our firm brings to serious claims. Read more about our case results, or call (201) 231-7847 to talk about what your own claim may involve.
Client reviews describe the responsiveness and care our team aims to deliver in every case:
“Michael Epstein is a wonderful, smart, caring and intelligent attorney. He was always responsive, supportive and got me dismissed from a high stakes lawsuit. I highly recommend him and the firm.” — Leslie, Google review
“Our experience working with The Epstein Law Firm was outstanding. There was regular communication throughout the entire process, and they kept us informed at every step. I would definitely endorse this firm to anyone seeking reliable and effective legal support.” — Esther, Google review
“I will definitely recommend the Epstein Law Firm P.A. to friends and other people whom I will know to have been involved in an accident.” — Aristeo, Google review
Read more from our clients on our Google reviews for the Rochelle Park office.
Tell The Epstein Law Firm what happened and get clear guidance about your injury claim and legal options.
Recognition applies to the named attorneys and selection years. See the linked profiles for details.
No aspect of this advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court of New Jersey. Rating methodology
Below are answers to common questions about failure to diagnose cancer in New Jersey. This information is general and not legal advice — contact our office for guidance about your specific situation.
It depends on what ‘it’ was and what the standard required at each visit. Watchful waiting is legitimate for findings that guidelines genuinely classify as low risk. It is not legitimate when the presentation — a growing lump, unexplained weight loss, rectal bleeding, a changing mole, persistent cough in a smoker — called for biopsy, imaging, or referral under accepted standards and none occurred.
These cases are reconstructed visit by visit: what was reported, what was documented, what was ordered, and what a careful physician would have done with the same information. The chart usually tells the story.
Sources: U.S. Preventive Services Task Force – screening recommendations; N.J.S.A. 2A:53A-27, affidavit of merit (Cornell Law Institute)
Possibly. Screening claims turn on the guidelines applicable to you — your age, sex, family history, and risk factors — and whether a reasonably careful physician would have ordered the mammogram, colonoscopy, low-dose CT, PSA, or Pap test that would likely have found the cancer earlier. The U.S. Preventive Services Task Force recommendations are central evidence of that standard.
The claim also requires proof the earlier screen would probably have detected the cancer while it was more treatable, which an oncology expert addresses from the tumor’s type and growth characteristics.
Sources: U.S. Preventive Services Task Force – screening recommendations; National Cancer Institute – how cancer is diagnosed
Potentially several parties: the clinician who ordered the test and never reviewed or communicated the result, the radiologist or pathologist whose report flagged it, and the practice or hospital whose results-management system allowed it to disappear. Modern offices run on electronic inboxes, and a result that lands in the wrong queue is a known failure mode the institution has a duty to guard against.
The audit trail shows when the result arrived, who opened it, and what happened next. We obtain that trail before it ages out of retention.
Sources: National Cancer Institute – how cancer is diagnosed; New Jersey Courts – Civil Division overview
Stage is the measure of the harm. A cancer found at Stage I might have required local treatment with a high cure probability; found at Stage III or IV, it requires systemic therapy with graver odds, and the damages analysis — added treatment burden, lost earnings, pain, and diminished life expectancy — follows that difference. New Jersey’s increased-risk doctrine allows recovery for the worsened prognosis the delay caused.
Oncology experts quantify the before-and-after using the tumor’s pathology and published survival data, and that quantification is usually the center of the case.
Sources: National Cancer Institute – how cancer is diagnosed; N.J.S.A. 2A:14-2, two-year limitations period (Cornell Law Institute)
Generally two years under N.J.S.A. 2A:14-2, running from when you knew or should have known of the cancer and that it may have been discoverable earlier. Because these failures often surface only when a new physician questions the delay, the discovery rule is central, and accrual dates are litigated carefully.
The affidavit of merit must be supported by expert review, which takes months. If you have learned your cancer could have been caught sooner, treat the deadline as short and have the records reviewed now.
Sources: N.J.S.A. 2A:14-2, two-year limitations period (Cornell Law Institute); N.J.S.A. 2A:53A-27, affidavit of merit (Cornell Law Institute)
A pathologist who misreads a biopsy — calling malignant tissue benign, or missing the diagnostic features a careful pathologist would report — can be liable, and laboratories answer for their systems and staffing. The original slides are preserved and can be re-examined, which makes pathology cases unusually provable: the evidence is the same tissue, read again.
Our review obtains the slides and blocks early, before retention schedules and storage practices complicate access, and puts them before a pathologist in the relevant subspecialty.
Sources: National Cancer Institute – how cancer is diagnosed; N.J.S.A. 2A:53A-27, affidavit of merit (Cornell Law Institute)
Not by itself — the second physician had the benefit of progression, new symptoms, and often the first workup to build on. But a rapid diagnosis after a change of doctors is a strong signal worth investigating, because it often shows the test that should have been ordered all along was neither exotic nor burdensome.
The legal test remains what the first physician did with the information available at the time, judged by experts in that specialty. Hindsight is not the standard; contemporaneous guidelines and symptoms are.
Guidelines from bodies like the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force and the relevant specialty societies are not statutes, but experts use them to establish what reasonably careful physicians do, and departures from them require explanation. A physician who skipped guideline-indicated screening for a patient with documented risk factors will have to justify the choice.
Guidelines cut both ways, and we evaluate them candidly: if the guidelines did not indicate screening for your situation, that bears on the claim and we will tell you so.
Sources: U.S. Preventive Services Task Force – screening recommendations; New Jersey Courts – Civil Division overview
Ordinarily two coordinated opinions: a physician in the defendant’s specialty on what should have been done at the time (ordered, referred, biopsied, followed up), and an oncologist on causation — what earlier detection would have changed in staging, treatment, and prognosis. New Jersey’s affidavit of merit statute requires the first opinion, sworn, within 60 days after the defendant answers.
We assemble both during the pre-suit review, because a causation gap is as fatal to these cases as a liability gap.
Sources: N.J.S.A. 2A:53A-27, affidavit of merit (Cornell Law Institute); National Cancer Institute – how cancer is diagnosed
Nothing out of pocket. Consultations are free and confidential, and medical malpractice cases are handled on a contingency fee under the schedule New Jersey court rules set: we are paid only if we recover compensation for you.
If our experts conclude the diagnosis was made as promptly as reasonable care allowed, we will tell you plainly and explain the analysis. Either way, you will know where you stand.
Sources: New Jersey Courts – Civil Division overview; N.J.S.A. 2A:14-2, two-year limitations period (Cornell Law Institute)
$31,000,000
$13,585,000
*Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances. *No aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. View Rating Methodology
Δ
<span data-mce-type="bookmark" style="display: inline-block; width: 0px; overflow: hidden; line-height: 0;" class="mce_SELRES_start"></span>
340 West Passaic Street Rochelle Park, NJ 07662
Fax: 201-845-5973 201-231-7847
Map + Directions
560 Sylvan Avenue, Suite 1000-A Englewood Cliffs, NJ 07632 (By Appointment Only)
201-734-3763
Map + directions
18-20 Lackawanna Plaza, Suite 200 Montclair, NJ 07042 (By Appointment Only)
973-381-8410
The Epstein Law Firm
The Epstein Law Firm