Truck Accident Lawyer
Uber Accident Lawyer
Lyft Accident Lawyer
Knowledge, experience, and dedication have brought the lawyers of The Epstein Law Firm to the forefront of their profession. From personal injury to civil litigation, they have built a strong record of success in achieving justice for their clients.
Our practice is diverse and well-established. Recognizing that every case is unique, we always begin by listening to you.
The Epstein Law Firm, P.A. has been successfully representing clients throughout New Jersey since 1973
A crash involving a bus, train, or light rail vehicle is not like a car accident. The injuries are often severe, there may be dozens of victims, and — critically — the operator is frequently a public entity. In New Jersey, that means NJ Transit, PATH, or a county or municipal bus system, and claims against public entities follow special rules with brutal deadlines.
The most dangerous of those rules: New Jersey’s Tort Claims Act generally requires a formal notice of claim within 90 days of the accident. Miss it, and your claim against the public entity is typically barred — even though the ordinary lawsuit deadline is two years. The Epstein Law Firm has represented New Jersey injury victims since 1973, and we know how to navigate the public-entity maze while building the strongest possible case.
If you were hurt in a bus, train, or transit accident, call (201) 231-7847 immediately for a free consultation. The 90-day clock may already be running.
The Epstein Law Firm
New Jersey Mass Transit Accident
Speak with The Epstein Law Firm about your situation and the next steps.
Call now
You may have a claim if you were injured:
Each victim has an individual case, even when many people were hurt in the same crash.
Three things make mass transit accidents uniquely difficult. First, the defendant is often the government. NJ Transit is a state agency, PATH is a bi-state authority, and many bus routes are run by counties or municipalities. Public entities enjoy immunities and procedural protections private defendants do not.
Second, the evidence is institutional. The transit agency controls the vehicle’s data recorders, maintenance logs, driver records, surveillance video, and dispatch communications. That evidence is preserved — or lost — according to the agency’s routines, not yours. Immediate legal action to demand preservation is essential.
Third, damages face special limits. New Jersey law restricts pain-and-suffering awards against public entities and bars punitive damages against them entirely. Building a case that clears those thresholds — documenting permanent injury and medical expenses — requires deliberate strategy from the start.
Transit victims can still recover fully — but only with lawyers who know the public-entity rules cold.
Under N.J.S.A. 59:8-8, a claim for injury against a public entity must be presented not later than the 90th day after the cause of action accrues. The notice must go to the right entity, in the right form, with the right contents. After six months from the agency’s receipt of the notice, you may file suit — but suit must still come within two years of the accident.
This is the single most common way transit cases die. Victims assume they have two years, focus on medical treatment, and discover the 90-day rule only after it has expired. Courts grant late-notice relief only in narrow circumstances, and counting on it is not a strategy.
The notice requirement applies to NJ Transit, PATH, county and municipal operators, and public entities responsible for road and crossing design. When in doubt, we file notices broadly and early — a notice you did not need costs nothing; a notice you needed and missed costs everything.
Liability in a transit crash often extends beyond the driver or operator:
Each defendant may face different rules — public-entity protections for some, ordinary negligence for others. Sorting that out early determines the entire litigation strategy, including which notices must be filed and when.
Two numbers control these cases, and the shorter one is the killer. 90 days: the Tort Claims Act notice deadline for claims against public entities, under N.J.S.A. 59:8-8. Two years: the deadline to file suit after the accident.
Private defendants — a negligent motorist, a private contractor, an equipment manufacturer — face the ordinary two-year personal injury limitations period under N.J.S.A. 2A:14-2, with no 90-day notice. But most transit crashes involve at least one public entity, so the 90-day rule effectively governs the whole case.
Practically, the deadline is “this week.” Vehicle data recorders can be overwritten, surveillance video erased, and witnesses scattered. The investigation must start while the evidence still exists.
A typical case unfolds like this:
Transit cases are document-heavy and slow-moving by nature — starting early is essential.
You do not need everything organized — but these items help us move fast on the deadlines:
There is no upfront cost to speak with us. We handle transit cases on a contingency basis — you pay no fee unless we recover for you.
A transit case pits an injured individual against a government agency with lawyers, investigators, and procedures designed to protect itself. The playing field levels only when your lawyers know the agency’s rulebook as well as the agency does.
The Epstein Law Firm has represented New Jersey injury victims since 1973, with more than 120 years of combined attorney experience. Attorney George Morton III and our team understand how institutional defendants litigate — but we deliberately remain a focused firm, so your case gets personal attention, not a file number.
When you call us after a transit accident, the first thing we do is protect your deadlines: notices filed, evidence preserved, investigation launched. The 90-day rule rewards speed, and speed is what we deliver.
If you were hurt in a New Jersey bus, train, or transit accident, time is genuinely short. Contact The Epstein Law Firm today for a free consultation. We will identify every deadline that applies to your case, file the notices that protect it, and fight for the full compensation you deserve.
Below are answers to common questions about bus, train, and transit injury claims in New Jersey. This information is general and not legal advice — which agency operated the vehicle and how the crash happened determine which rules apply, so contact our office promptly for guidance about your situation.
You must present a formal notice of claim to the public entity not later than the 90th day after the accident, under N.J.S.A. 59:8-8. After six months from the agency’s receipt of the notice, you may file suit — but the lawsuit itself must still be filed within two years of the accident.
This 90-day notice is the deadline that ends more transit cases than any other rule. Victims who assume they have two years discover the notice requirement only after it has expired, and courts excuse late notices only in narrow circumstances. If a bus, train, or light rail vehicle was involved, treat the first week as the real deadline.
Sources: NJ Courts — Appellate Division opinion: 90-day Tort Claims Act notice (N.J.S.A. 59:8-8); NJ Transit — Safety Information
Yes. Public transit agencies can be sued for negligence — negligent operation, hiring, training, supervision, or maintenance — but New Jersey’s Tort Claims Act wraps those lawsuits in special rules: the 90-day notice of claim, a six-month waiting period before suit, and limits on certain damages.
The Federal Railroad Administration oversees rail safety nationally, and its investigations sometimes uncover violations that support a civil case, but the lawsuit itself proceeds under New Jersey law in state court. The key is getting the procedure right from day one so the substance of your case ever gets heard.
Sources: NJ Transit — Safety Information; NJ Courts — Appellate Division opinion: Tort Claims Act limits on public-entity liability
Medical expenses, lost income, and other economic losses are recoverable. But N.J.S.A. 59:9-2 limits pain-and-suffering damages against public entities: they are available only in cases of permanent loss of a bodily function, permanent disfigurement, or dismemberment where medical treatment expenses exceed $3,600. Punitive damages are barred entirely against public entities.
That threshold shapes case strategy from the start. Documenting permanency — through treating physicians and specialists — and tracking every dollar of medical expense is not just good practice; it is the legal key that unlocks full damages. Cases against private co-defendants, like a negligent motorist or contractor, are not subject to these limits.
Sources: NJ Courts — Appellate Division opinion: Tort Claims Act limits on public-entity liability; National Transportation Safety Board — Accident Investigations
Get medical care first, even if you feel “okay” — adrenaline masks injuries, and gaps in treatment are used against victims later. Report the incident to the driver or conductor and get a copy of any incident report. Photograph the scene, the vehicle, and your injuries, and collect names and phone numbers of fellow passengers who saw what happened.
Then call a lawyer quickly — not eventually. The 90-day notice clock is running, and the agency’s video, vehicle data, and maintenance records are subject to routine destruction schedules. Early preservation demands are often the difference between a provable case and an unsolvable one.
Sources: NJ Transit — Safety Information; National Transportation Safety Board — Accident Investigations
Often several parties share responsibility: private maintenance contractors, vehicle or equipment manufacturers when brakes, doors, or signals fail, other motorists who triggered the crash, and public entities responsible for dangerous road or crossing design. Each may face different legal rules.
Identifying every defendant matters because public-entity damage limits do not apply to private co-defendants. A thorough investigation — maintenance contracts, equipment inspection histories, crossing signal records — frequently reveals that the agency was not the only one at fault, and sometimes not the most at fault.
Sources: National Transportation Safety Board — Accident Investigations; NJ Courts — Appellate Division opinion: Tort Claims Act limits on public-entity liability
Boarding and alighting injuries — falls on steps, doors closing on passengers, sudden starts before you are seated — are among the most common transit claims. Transit operators owe passengers a high duty of care, and drivers are expected to allow safe boarding, keep steps and platforms clear, and not move the vehicle until passengers are safely aboard or clear.
These cases often turn on witness testimony and video: did the driver check mirrors, were the steps wet or damaged, did the doors malfunction? Fellow passengers are invaluable witnesses, which is why collecting their contact information at the scene matters so much.
Sources: NJ Transit — Safety Information; New Jersey Department of Transportation — Official Site.
Yes. Pedestrians struck by buses bring claims under the same Tort Claims Act framework — 90-day notice, then suit within two years — with liability turning on the driver’s negligence: speed, distraction, failure to yield, or blind-spot errors common to large vehicles. Bus companies are expected to train drivers specifically for pedestrian hazards.
Pedestrian cases against buses often involve severe injuries, which makes the damages documentation — and the permanency threshold for pain-and-suffering against public entities — central to the case value. Intersection cameras, bus dash video, and the vehicle’s data recorder are the key evidence, and all of it must be preserved immediately.
Sources: NJ Courts — Appellate Division opinion: 90-day Tort Claims Act notice (N.J.S.A. 59:8-8); New Jersey Department of Transportation — Official Site
Crossing cases investigate three things: the driver’s conduct, the train’s operation (speed, horn, braking), and the crossing itself — signal timing, gate function, sight lines, and vegetation or structures blocking the view. The Federal Railroad Administration regulates crossing safety, and its data and investigations can illuminate systemic problems at a particular crossing.
Liability may fall on the railroad, the public entity responsible for the roadway, the crossing equipment maintainer, or a combination. These are technically complex cases requiring event-recorder data, signal logs, and crossing history — evidence that must be demanded before routine retention periods expire.
Sources: NJ Courts — Appellate Division opinion: 90-day Tort Claims Act notice (N.J.S.A. 59:8-8); National Transportation Safety Board — Accident Investigations
Expect one to three years. The six-month waiting period after the Tort Claims Act notice, the volume of agency documents, and the number of potential defendants all extend the timeline. Cases with severe injuries take longer because the full medical picture must develop before damages can be valued accurately.
The slow pace is another reason to start fast: a case filed at month five moves very differently from one scrambling at month twenty. We keep clients informed throughout and push discovery aggressively so the agency’s bureaucracy does not become your delay.
Sources: NJ Courts — Appellate Division opinion: Tort Claims Act suit deadlines (N.J.S.A. 59:8-9); NJ Transit — Safety Information
Our firm handles mass transit cases on a contingency-fee basis: you pay no attorney’s fee unless we recover compensation for you. The consultation is free, and we advance the costs of investigation — accident reconstruction, records demands, and experts — which transit cases demand from the very beginning.
Given the 90-day notice deadline, cost should never be the reason a victim waits. The early work — notices, preservation demands, investigation — is exactly what the contingency structure covers, so there is no financial reason to delay the call that protects your claim.
Sources: NJ Courts — Appellate Division opinion: Tort Claims Act limits on public-entity liability; NJ Transit — Safety Information
Selected results reported by The Epstein Law Firm.
Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Each case depends on its own facts, evidence, and applicable law.
These excerpts describe experiences with the firm. They are not identified as cases in this practice area and do not predict another outcome.
“They took the time to explain everything clearly, making sure I understood my options and felt comfortable with each step of the process.”
— R. S. · Read the full Google review
“Michael and his team were incredibly responsive, always keeping us informed and addressing any questions or concerns promptly.”
— s. v. · Read the full Google review
No aspect of this advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court of New Jersey. Rating methodology
The Epstein Law Firm serves clients from three New Jersey locations:
Call for a free consultation. There is no fee unless we recover for you.
$31,000,000
$13,585,000
*Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances. *No aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. View Rating Methodology
Δ
<span data-mce-type="bookmark" style="display: inline-block; width: 0px; overflow: hidden; line-height: 0;" class="mce_SELRES_start"></span>
340 West Passaic Street Rochelle Park, NJ 07662
Fax: 201-845-5973 201-231-7847
Map + Directions
560 Sylvan Avenue, Suite 1000-A Englewood Cliffs, NJ 07632 (By Appointment Only)
201-734-3763
Map + directions
18-20 Lackawanna Plaza, Suite 200 Montclair, NJ 07042 (By Appointment Only)
973-381-8410
The Epstein Law Firm
The Epstein Law Firm